
AI can fake a face — but not a soul
Photo by imaginima via Getty Images
The moral exit
The conventional answer to this dilemma is regulation: copyright reforms, consent standards, watermarking requirements. But the real solution begins with refusal. Actors shouldn’t sell their avatars. Consumers shouldn’t support platforms that replace people with synthetic ghosts.
If TikTok and other media giants populate their feeds with digital clones, users should boycott them and demand “fair-trade human content.” Just as conscientious shoppers insist on buying ethically sourced goods, viewers should insist on art and advertising made by living, breathing humans.
Tech evangelists argue that AI avatars will soon become indistinguishable from the people they’re modeled on. But that misses the point. The more perfect the imitation, the greater the lie. What people crave isn’t flawless illusion — it’s authenticity. They want to see imperfection, effort, and presence. They want to see life.
If we surrender that, we’ll lose something far more valuable than any acting career or TikTok deal. We’ll lose the very thing that makes us human.
You may also like
By mfnnews
search
categories
Archives
navigation
Recent posts
- How do you solve a problem like Wikipedia? January 11, 2026
- ‘A giant step back’: Liberals rage against red meat after new food pyramid guidelines release January 11, 2026
- Caregiving decisions begin in the bathroom January 11, 2026
- DMW spent P5 million for OFW shelters in Taiwan in 2025 –Cacdac January 11, 2026
- PBA: TNT dominates Meralco to move a win away from Philippine Cup finals January 11, 2026
- MGEN denies buying stake in Leviste”s solar venture January 11, 2026
- From fisherman to Top 6 bar passer: Joewy Ompad shares his inspiring story January 11, 2026








Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.