
AI can fake a face — but not a soul
Photo by imaginima via Getty Images
The moral exit
The conventional answer to this dilemma is regulation: copyright reforms, consent standards, watermarking requirements. But the real solution begins with refusal. Actors shouldn’t sell their avatars. Consumers shouldn’t support platforms that replace people with synthetic ghosts.
If TikTok and other media giants populate their feeds with digital clones, users should boycott them and demand “fair-trade human content.” Just as conscientious shoppers insist on buying ethically sourced goods, viewers should insist on art and advertising made by living, breathing humans.
Tech evangelists argue that AI avatars will soon become indistinguishable from the people they’re modeled on. But that misses the point. The more perfect the imitation, the greater the lie. What people crave isn’t flawless illusion — it’s authenticity. They want to see imperfection, effort, and presence. They want to see life.
If we surrender that, we’ll lose something far more valuable than any acting career or TikTok deal. We’ll lose the very thing that makes us human.
You may also like
By mfnnews
search
categories
Archives
navigation
Recent posts
- Former New Jersey Governor Who Took Over For Scandal-Plagued Predecessor Dies January 11, 2026
- Philadelphia Sheriff Goes Viral For Threatening ICE January 11, 2026
- The Obamacare subsidy fight exposes who Washington really serves January 11, 2026
- The crisis of ‘trembling pastors’: Why church leaders are ignoring core theology because it’s ‘political’ January 11, 2026
- Dobol B TV Livestream: January 12, 2026 January 11, 2026
- Ogie Diaz ukol kay Liza Soberano: ‘Wala siyang sama ng loob sa akin. Ako rin naman…’ January 11, 2026
- LOOK: Another ‘uson” descends Mayon Volcano January 11, 2026








Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.