Day: November 4, 2025
Obama jumping into New Jersey gubernatorial race at 11th hour is ‘desperate,’ voters say
Republican voters criticize President Barack Obama’s campaign appearance for Rep. Mikie Sherrill as ‘fake excitement’ during a Turning Point Action rally for Jack Ciattarelli.
Questions grow about soldier’s Tesla Cybertruck attack at Trump Las Vegas hotel
Federal authorities classified Matthew Livelsberger’s manifesto after the premeditated Cybertruck attack at Trump International Hotel left his motive unanswered.
Illinois man allegedly threatens Trump execution in profanity-laced videos, faces federal charges
Illinois man faces federal charges after posting Instagram videos calling for Trump’s execution, sparking Secret Service investigation into interstate threats.
UFC cuts fighter after sportsbooks flag ‘unusual’ betting activity on his first-round loss
The UFC ct 29-year-old Isaac Dulgarian after betting irregularities surfaced following his submission loss to Yadier del Valle, sparking an integrity investigation.
Charlamagne tells Democrats to give up and end the government shutdown, laments ‘you lost the fight’
Charlamagne tha God told Democrats to give up their government shutdown fight and provide relief to Americans struggling without SNAP benefits.
NHL star Arthur Kaliyev accused of scamming girlfriend, fellow players to fuel gambling habit
NHL player Arthur Kaliyev accused of $50,000 fraud scheme targeting girlfriend to fund gambling addiction, using fake checks and intimidation tactics.
Meet the Nepo Baby Theater Kid Steering Democrats Toward Bearded Socialism
It’s no surprise that the Democratic Party’s embrace of chic left-wing radicalism—anti-capitalism plus anti-anti-terrorism—is being driven by a bunch of fancy prep-school kids with hipster beards. Zohran Mamdani is on the verge of being elected mayor of New York City and becoming the de facto party leader. Democrats are equally enamored with Graham Platner, the U.S. Senate candidate in Maine, in spite of his “accidental” Nazi tattoo and myriad personality flaws.
The post Meet the Nepo Baby Theater Kid Steering Democrats Toward Bearded Socialism appeared first on .
3I/ATLAS: Why are ‘scientists’ desperate to deny intelligent aliens could exist?
The Manhattan-size comet known as 3I/ATLAS that flew eerily close to the sun as well as several other planets has ignited a spirited debate surrounding the comet’s true meaning — with some pointing out that it could be an extraterrestrial spacecraft.
And Harvard’s renowned astrophysicist Avi Loeb is among them, proposing a 40% chance that alien technology hides inside the mysterious comet.
“Do you believe that, with what we’ve seen from 3I/ATLAS, that there is a chance that life form is on it, whether the life form is dead or alive?” BlazeTV contributor Jeff Fisher asks Loeb on “Pat Gray Unleashed.”
“It’s possible,” Loeb responds. “It’s possible that life was delivered to the solar system from outside. We just don’t know, you know, and scientists are very good at pretending to be the adults in the room saying, ‘You know, that’s what we think,’ but the point is, you know, nature is much more imaginative than we are.”
“And the best way to learn is to observe and study whatever nature delivers to our backyard. And the thing about a visitor from outside the solar system or that comes to our backyard is, you know, that it’s a new risk that nobody considered before,” he continues.
“And why is it, do you think, that other scientists are so reluctant to admit the possibility that this is alien tech or that there’s alien tech out there?” BlazeTV host Pat Gray asks. “I mean, it’s a massive universe, and certainly there’s life in it other than us.”
“Well, I think, first, they are quite arrogant in thinking that there is nothing as intelligent as we are, and that includes not only scientists but other people” Loeb responds.
“I think it’s arrogant to believe that because most of the stars, you know, formed before the sun by billions of years, and there are 100 billion stars. So just thinking that we are the smartest in the class of intelligent civilization is really arrogant. Makes no sense,” he continues.
“And, you know, one way to find them is not by waiting for a phone call like we did for 60 years waiting for a radio signal,” he says. “Instead, let’s just check our backyard.”
Want more from Pat Gray?
To enjoy more of Pat’s biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
BBC allegedly deceptively edited Trump’s Jan. 6 speech into riot lie
President Donald Trump was accused of inciting a riot at the Capitol during his speech to supporters on January 6, 2021. An allegedly deceptively edited clip from that address, which aired on a BBC special just a month before the 2024 presidential election, created the impression that those accusations against Trump were accurate.
The BBC’s one-hour Panorama special “Trump: A Second Chance?” featured a clip where the president appeared to say, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.”
‘As well as altering Mr. Trump’s words, the documentary also showed flag-waving men marching on the Capitol in Washington, DC, on Jan. 6, 2021, after the president spoke, which created the impression Trump’s supporters had taken up his “call to arms.”‘
However, an internal memo obtained by the Telegraph accused the BBC of heavily editing the clip by allegedly splicing segments of his speech that were nearly an hour apart.
An unedited version of Trump’s speech revealed his actual words.
“We’re gonna walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We’re gonna walk down. We’re gonna walk down any one you want, but I think right here, we’re gonna walk down to the Capitol, and we’re gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. And we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness; you have to show strength, and you have to be strong. … I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,” Trump said.
Approximately 54 minutes later, while discussing his concerns about election integrity, Trump said, “Most people would stand there at 9 o’clock in the evening and say, ‘I wanna thank you very much,’ and they go off to some other life, but I said something’s wrong here, something’s really wrong, can’t have happened, and we fight.”
“We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore,” Trump added.
RELATED: Republicans enraged by weaponized FBI Arctic Frost investigation: ‘Biden DOJ’s Watergate’
Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
The allegedly manipulated footage, which aired last October, made Trump “‘say’ things [he] never actually said,” according to a 19-page dossier on the BBC’s alleged bias.
“As well as altering Mr. Trump’s words, the documentary also showed flag-waving men marching on the Capitol in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021, after the president spoke, which created the impression Trump’s supporters had taken up his ‘call to arms.’ In fact, the footage was shot before Mr. Trump had even started speaking,” the Telegraph wrote.
When BBC managers were alerted about the misleading edits, they allegedly “refused to accept there had been a breach of standards.”
RELATED: Analysis: FBI’s Jan. 6 pipe bomb update omits key evidence, withholds video
Photo by Peter Dazeley/Getty Images
Michael Prescott, a former independent external adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee, wrote the bias dossier before leaving his role in June.
“While we don’t comment on leaked documents, when the BBC receives feedback, it takes it seriously and considers it carefully,” a BBC spokesperson told Blaze News. “Michael Prescott is a former adviser to a board committee where differing views and opinions of our coverage are routinely discussed and debated.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Wisconsin mom who criticized ‘woke, White’ social justice coordinator beats defamation lawsuit
A mother and activist who criticized a “social justice coordinator” was able to overcome a defamation lawsuit by a former English teacher.
Mary MacCudden accused Scarlett Johnson of harming her reputation when Johnson wrote critical messages in Oct. 2022 about MacCudden’s job at the Mequon-Thiensville School District in Wisconsin.
‘I felt I had to fight back in this case. … I had to stand up because this would never stop.’
“Why the hell am I paying for a ‘Social Justice Coordinator’ in my school district?” Johnson wrote with a screenshot of MacCudden’s LinkedIn profile. “This is just what @mtschools needs; more woke, White women w/ a god complex. Thank you, White savior.”
Johnson went on to describe diversity, equity, and inclusion practitioners as “woke lunatics” who “bully” parents “into silence and compliance.”
Attorneys for the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty argued that Johnson’s criticisms were merely “run-of-the-mill social media posts” that were protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday on Johnson’s side.
“We conclude that Johnson’s statements do not constitute defamation. Thus, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to enter summary judgment in Johnson’s favor,” the court said.
The ruling found some of the terms she used were subjective, while others were “vague and do not have a clear meaning or definition.”
Johnson told Fox News Digital that the lawsuit was intended to silence parents from criticizing DEI policies.
“I felt I had to fight back in this case. It couldn’t be like the other. I had to stand up because this would never stop,” she said. “They’d keep going after parents like me.”
RELATED: Equity activists are outraged that ‘white guilt’ has run out after corporations force out DEI chiefs
Luke Berg, the deputy counsel for WILL, praised the ruling.
“Scarlett, like all of us, has the right to question and criticize her government,” read the statement. “The defamation lawsuit against her was meritless and should have been promptly dismissed. We are pleased that the Court agreed, and that Scarlett can put this distraction behind her.”
MacCudden’s attorney, James McAlister, did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!