
Blaze Media Chicago ice attacks Ice facility in chicago National guard order Politics Supreme court vs trump
2 Trump appointees join majority as SCOTUS rules against president’s order to deploy National Guard troops to Chicago
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday against the Trump administration asking to allow the president to order National Guard troops to Chicago, Illinois.
Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch publicly dissented from the opinion, which passed 6 to 3.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Trump-appointed Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined the majority. Kavanaugh wrote a separate concurring opinion.
‘The government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois.’
The Trump administration argued that it had the authority to order troops into Chicago in order to protect federal agents performing deportation operations. The government was asking for a stay against an order blocking the troops from U.S. District Judge April Perry in October.
“At this preliminary stage, the government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the majority order reads.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote that federal officers were “forced to operate under the constant threat of mob violence” and cited incidents where they were threatened and assaulted.
Much of the protests and violence has been directed against an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in the Chicago suburb of Broadview.
“Finally a ruling from this Supreme Court that makes clear what all patriotic Americans know: No Kings,” wrote Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.
RELATED: DHS has a message for ‘cowards’ threatening ICE on social media — influencer laughs in response
Democratic Illinois Governor JB Pritzker previously criticized the administration over the troop order.
“Donald Trump will keep trying to invade Illinois with troops — and we will keep defending the sovereignty of our state,” Pritzker said in a statement. “Militarizing our communities against their will is not only un-American but also leads us down a dangerous path for our democracy. What will come next?”
Other critics of National Guard orders from the White House accuse the president of trying to militarize the streets in order to intimidate his political opponents.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
You may also like
By mfnnews
search
categories
Archives
navigation
Recent posts
- Pope Leo calls out ‘inclusive’ language as a painful, ‘Orwellian’ movement in the West January 10, 2026
- How a pro-life law in Kentucky lets mothers get away with murder January 10, 2026
- Young white Americans want their own identity politics now — and conservatives shouldn’t be surprised January 10, 2026
- House to vet Madriaga”s claims vs VP Sara, says Ridon January 10, 2026
- Iranian hospitals overwhelmed with injuries as protests rage across Islamic Republic January 10, 2026
- Trump answers on whether he’d order a mission to capture Putin January 10, 2026
- US military launches airstrikes against ISIS targets in Syria, officials say January 10, 2026







Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.