Category: Alabama
Black lives matter? The accused serial killer you have likely never heard of
His name is Damien McDaniel.
McDaniel is a 23-year-old black man from Fairfield, Alabama, who is currently awaiting trial after allegedly murdering 18 people — yes, 18 people — and wounding over 30 others in little more than a year. He is accused of participating in not one but two mass shootings as well as eight other shootings during this time frame, one of which took the life an unborn child.
‘The media are FASCINATED by white serial killers. Black … serial killers? Not so much.’
McDaniel had multiple arrests as a juvenile, including in connection with a shooting in 2019 when he was 17. On April 26, 2023, he pled guilty to two counts of attempted murder in that case and was sentenced to 15 years with 13 years suspended. Between the suspended sentence and time served, McDaniel was soon released from custody.
Less than three months later, the killing spree attributed to McDaniel began.
According to the allegations, McDaniel, sometimes in conjunction with other assailants, gunned down:
- firefighter Jordan Melton on July 12, 2023, as he and firefighter Jamal Jones were performing routine maintenance at their fire station with the bay door propped open. Jones was also shot but fortunately survived.
- 52-year-old Reginald Bryant on November 27, 2023, in an allegedly “targeted” attack.
- 21-year-old Mia Nickson on January 10, 2024.
- Angeliyah Webster and Christian Norris, both 20, as well as their unborn child. They were last seen alive on February 14, 2024, and their bodies were discovered inside a car three days later, on February 17.
- 44-year-old Anthony Lamar Love Jr. on April 9, 2024, in the parking lot of a UPS facility where Love worked, in what police believe was a case of murder for hire.
- four people on July 13, 2024, at a place then known as the Trendsetters Lounge and Event Center: Lerandus Anderson, 24; Markeisha Gettings, 39; Stevie McGhee, 39; and Angela Witherspoon, 56.
- 61-year-old Charlie Herbert Moore on August 13, 2024.
Tragically, this brutal 14-month bloodbath then ended with a bang — lots of them. Over the course of three days, McDaniel allegedly participated in shootings that killed:
- 35-year-old Diontranet Tinae Brown at a bar on September 19, 2024.
- four people and wounded 17 others at the Hush Lounge on September 21, 2024. The four deceased in that case are: Tahj Booker, 27; Anitra Holloman, 21; Carlos McCain, 27; and Roderick Patterson, 26.
- 32-year-old Jamarcus McIntyre on September 22, 2024.
McDaniel, whose father is currently serving a 26-year sentence for federal drug- and weapons-related offenses, was rearrested in October 2024 and subsequently charged in the above slayings. In many cases, he has been charged with capital murder.
Other suspects charged with murder in some of the cases include: Charles Nance, 41; Lorenzo Wiley, 30; and Hatarius Woods, 28.
McDaniel has pled not guilty to all charges. His attorney John Robbins declined Blaze News’ request for comment, citing a gag order. Earlier this year, Robbins described McDaniel as a “very gentle, kind person” who “doesn’t fit the mold of someone who would do these types of crimes.”
Composite screenshot of jail records (left: Hatarius Woods | right: Charles Nance)
Each one of these cases appears to have been an instance of black-on-black violence. Every suspect is black, and every deceased victim was also black, as is injured victim Jamal Jones.
Birmingham Mayor Randall Woodfin — who is black, lost a brother to gun violence, and witnessed his sister being shot — has called out McDaniel for behavior so “brazen” and violent that “he needed to be all the way off our streets.” “This is a person who was hell-bent on literally hurting people and taking lives,” Woodfin said.
In fact, the murders of Webster, Norris, and their unborn baby were personal for Mayor Woodfin, who described one of the victims as his cousin.
“My family is no stranger to the devastating consequences of violence. The pain never gets easier. This level of loss is distressing, unacceptable, and cannot — must not — be tolerated,” Woodfin said at the time, referring to the Webster/Norris shooting as well as a separate mass shooting in his city that occurred on the same day the couple was found.
McDaniel is scheduled to go on trial in April 2026 in connection with the mass shooting at the Trendsetters lounge. Should he be convicted of those murders as well as of the others, he will be, in the words of conservative talk-show host Larry Elder, “the most prolific serial killer in the history of Alabama.” He would also have been responsible for 30% of the homicides in Birmingham between July and September 2024.
While local media have regularly reported on the accusations against McDaniel, his name and the names of his many, many alleged victims remain largely unfamiliar to Americans living outside Alabama.
Elder postulates that race is the primary reason. “The media are FASCINATED by white serial killers. Black … serial killers? Not so much,” he wrote.
After listening to Elder, Bob Hoge of RedState agreed that the “corrupt corporate media” isn’t interested in reporting on the cases because McDaniel “doesn’t fit their narrative.”
Since “these alleged murders were not carried out by white supremacists or MAGA fans,” national media outlets act “as if it never happened,” Hoge claimed.
Mayor Woodfin has dutifully followed the prevailing narrative regarding race, establishing the Division of Social Justice and Racial Equity in the Birmingham mayoral office a couple of years ago and thereby tacitly propagating the notion that problems in black and other minority communities stem from bigoted whites.
Among its goals, the Division of Social Justice and Racial Equity has pledged to “reduce violence through holistic peace strategies” and “improve the quality of life for all Birmingham residents.” Thus far, it does not seem to have delivered on those promises.
Mayor Woodfin attends White House event in September 2024 about ending gun violence.Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images
In 2024, the number of homicides in Birmingham reached an all-time high.
Data from the coroner’s office in Jefferson County, which has a black population of over 40%, revealed that homicides there spiked from 531 in 2013 to a staggering 942 in 2023. The data further shows that gun violence remains the leading cause of death in Jefferson County, followed by drugs, opioids in particular. Heart disease is a distant fourth.
Birmingham does have a local chapter of Black Lives Matter that decried the “heartbreaking surge in homicides” in 2024 and called out Woodfin for prioritizing opportunities for self-promotion over “community safety.” However, the group, which has posted repeatedly about standing in solidarity with Palestinians and condemning the so-called “genocide” in Gaza, does not seem to have ever mentioned McDaniel specifically or the black people he is accused of killing.
In October 2024, the same month McDaniel was rearrested following the string of murders, Birmingham BLM “core leader” Eric Hall tied violence in the city to political “disinvestment” in education and mental health and slammed those associating violence with black culture.
“The notion that violent crime is a cultural trait rather than a consequence of systemic disenfranchisement must be challenged vigorously. We must hold our elected officials accountable for their role in perpetuating policies that marginalize communities and increase poverty,” Hall wrote.
Hall has also shared stories on social media about recent ICE raids and federal workers fired under Trump, but nothing about the murders of which McDaniel stands accused.
The national Black Lives Matter organization has apparently made no mention of the cases either.
Woodfin and the Birmingham and national chapters of BLM did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.
In December, Hall was arrested and charged with misdemeanor domestic assault. The race of his alleged victim is unknown.
A lengthy first-person message was posted on McDaniel’s personal Facebook account in July, suggesting that McDaniel is not a “monster” but instead a “man of God” and a victim of the system. The post claimed McDaniel’s due process rights have been “illegally” violated on numerous occasions by those “who took an oath to protect us,” according to WVTM.
“While imprisoned I have been beaten threatened and harassed. They have even went as far as putting metal in my food. They confined me to solitary confinement so that what was being done to me was a secret,” the message read in part. “… Everytime [sic] I am transported back to Jefferson county I feel as if my life is in danger and they are trying to kill me, which is why I am hesitant to even attend court.”
The message also claimed that McDaniel was duped into pleading guilty to the attempted murder charges when he was still a juvenile.
“They tell yall their side of the story but I have a question, can yall handle my side of the story?” the author wrote.
At the time the message was posted to Facebook, McDaniel was in county jail with no computer access except a tablet with which to make phone calls, jail officials claimed, prompting questions about who may have written and posted the message.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
If parental rights can be bypassed in Alabama, no state is safe
Millions of Americans fled deep-blue states like California and New York because they believed the rules were different elsewhere. They moved to places like Alabama to escape lockdowns, mandates, and ideological capture of public institutions. They believed red states meant red lines.
That belief is proving dangerously naïve.
If red states cannot enforce their own parental rights laws, then the red-state refuge is a myth.
Alabama is one of the most conservative states in the country. It has a Republican supermajority and some of the strongest parental rights laws on the books: bans on gender-transition procedures for minors, curriculum transparency requirements, legal definitions of male and female, protections for girls’ sports, and a rare requirement that parents must opt in before schools provide any mental health services, including discussions of suicide or bullying.
And yet those protections are now being quietly hollowed out — not by legislators, but by bureaucratic subversion.
The footnote loophole
The Alabama State Department of Education is undermining parental consent by inserting exceptions into the fine print of a required opt-in form distributed after a new parental consent law took effect Oct. 1.
The law itself is unambiguous. Parents must provide prior written consent before schools offer mental health services, including discussions related to suicide or bullying. But the department claims in the footnotes that mental health-related conversations may still occur “as appropriate” in other school settings — and that these interactions do not require parental permission.
The ALSDE has stated that “instruction, advisement, and occasional interventions are not subject to opt-in requirements, as these are regular duties of school counselors and other educators.”
That language does more than stretch the statute. It appears designed to bypass it entirely. When schools engage minors in discussions with clear psychological or therapeutic implications — trauma, gender identity, suicidal ideation — without parental consent, they move into legally and constitutionally questionable territory.
Same playbook, new label
Parents have seen this before. During COVID, mandates were imposed first and justified later. Dissent was sidelined. Authority flowed downward, not outward.
Now the same model is being applied to school-based mental health. Whether embedded in social-emotional learning, “student wellness,” or character education, the result is the same: psychological interventions delivered by school employees, not licensed physicians, without parental oversight.
This is not a gray area. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed parents’ fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their children. When school systems create end runs around opt-in requirements — especially on matters involving suicide or gender ideology — they invite serious legal and civil rights challenges.
No state is immune
This is not an Alabama anomaly.
Illinois now mandates mental health screenings for public school students, with no opt-in. Mississippi is rolling out a statewide “youth wellness platform.” Tennessee is placing mental health clinicians in every public school through a $250 million trust fund. Ohio is expanding school-based health centers that embed mental health treatment directly on campus.
These programs erase the line between education and health care. They normalize a system in which children’s emotions are monitored, recorded, and interpreted by the state without parental consent. That is state-sponsored emotional profiling.
Who decides what helps?
This debate is not about whether children need support. It is about who decides what support looks like — and who has the authority to provide it.
Parents possess a fundamental right to make decisions about their children’s mental and physical health. The Supreme Court’s decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor reaffirmed that when schools impose ideologically loaded services or content without notice or opt-out, they burden parental rights and religious liberty.
RELATED: ‘Incredible victory’: Federal judge prohibits trans-related grooming efforts in California schools
Photo by Luis Soto/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Alabama’s counseling framework includes DEI-driven language encouraging students to “identify individual differences” and “describe and respect differences among individuals.” In practice, that language provides a vehicle for embedding gender ideology and values-based content into guidance lessons.
When that content is paired with school-based interventions, the issue is no longer education. It is ideological formation funded by taxpayers and imposed without consent.
Alabama’s warning
If this can happen in Alabama — arguably the most pro-parental-rights state in the country — then no state is safe.
Agencies should not be allowed to bury statutes in footnotes, reinterpret laws by memo, or use therapeutic language to bypass parental authority. These are not technical disagreements. They are unconstitutional and demand legal pushback.
If red states cannot enforce their own parental rights laws, then the red-state refuge is a myth.
Strong laws matter, but enforcement matters more. Parents must demand both.
Yet another state’s districts found to be racist, resulting in new map for 2026 midterms
Amid the several race-based redistricting fights across the country ahead of the midterms, including states like Texas and California, one Southern state joined the ranks Monday in a move that has left nobody satisfied.
A federal judge ordered a small redistricting effort after finding back in August that the current Alabama state Senate district map violated the Voting Rights Act.
The new plan does enough to remedy the disparities while not upsetting other districts.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge Anna Manasco, a first-term Trump appointee, ordered that a new map that rearranged District 25 and District 26, two Montgomery-area districts, be implemented in time for the 2026 midterms.
Democrat state Senator Kirk Hatcher currently represents Senate District 26, and Republican state Senator Will Barfoot represents Senate District 25.
RELATED: North Carolina Republicans will ‘follow Trump’s call’ to redistrict the state
Alabama Governor Kay Ivey (R).Photo by Stew Milne/Getty Images
The primary issue with the old district map was that it was found to “pack” black voters into one district, weakening their voting power in other districts.
Manasco wrote that the new plan “unpacks District 26 by moving some Black voters from District 26 into the adjacent District 25.”
The decision has been met with a widespread lack of enthusiasm in the Republican trifecta state, with many uncertain that a satisfactory outcome could be achieved.
Manasco wrote that the new plan does enough to remedy the disparities while not upsetting other districts.
Court-appointed special master Richard Allen warned in a court filing that the plan only “weakly remedies” the Voting Rights Act violation.
“As the law currently stands, states like Alabama are put to the virtually impossible task of protecting some voters based on race without discriminating against any other voters based on race. I remain hopeful that we will somehow find the ‘magic map’ that will both satisfy the federal court and also be fair to all Alabamians,” Republican Governor Kay Ivey wrote in September, according to the AP.
Based on this reasoning, Ivey declined to call a special session for the legislature to redraw the district maps in September.
The new map does not upset the partisan distribution of power in the state, where Republicans hold a majority, 27 to 8.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Alabama Police Get Revenge Using ‘Old School Rules’ After High School Seniors Cover HQ With Toilet Paper
‘Perfected this craft years ago.’
