Don't miss...
‘American Kitchen’ celebrity chef shares secret of making restaurant-quality prime rib at home for Christmas
Celebrity chef David Burke’s spice-crusted prime rib recipe is featured on Fox Nation’s new series, “American Kitchen” — and is perfect for holiday entertaining.
Minnesota residents slam Walz, state oversight after $250M Feeding Our Future fraud
Minneapolis residents express frustration over the state’s handling of the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scandal, which has shaken confidence in Gov. Tim Walz and sparked debate about oversight, accountability and the Somali community.
Brian Glenn reveals engagement to Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene: ‘She said ‘yes”
White House correspondent Brian Glenn indicated in a post on X that he and Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia have gotten engaged.
Trump v. Slaughter exposes who really fears democracy
In the recently argued Trump v. Slaughter case, most of the U.S. Supreme Court seemed to affirm what should be obvious: The president has a constitutional right under Article II to dismiss federal employees in the executive branch when it suits him.
That conclusion strikes many of us as self-evident. Executive-branch employees work under the president, who alone among them is chosen in a nationwide election. Bureaucrats are not. Why, then, should the chief executive’s subordinates be insulated from his control?
When the Roberts Court overturned Roe in 2022 and returned the issue to the states, many voters responded with fury. The electorate did not welcome responsibility. It resented it.
A vocal minority on the court appears to reject that premise. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor warned that allowing a president — implicitly a Republican one — to control executive personnel would unleash political chaos. Jackson suggested Trump “would be free to fire all the scientists, the doctors, the economists, and PhDs” working for the federal government. Sotomayor went further, claiming the administration was “asking to destroy the structure of government.”
David Harsanyi, in a perceptive commentary, identified what animates this view: “fourth-branch blues.” The administrative state now exercises power that rivals or exceeds that of the constitutional branches. As Harsanyi noted, nothing in the founders’ design envisioned “a sprawling autonomous administrative state empowered to create its own rules, investigate citizens, adjudicate guilt, impose fines, and destroy lives.”
Yet defenders of this system frame presidential oversight as a threat to “democracy.” Democrats, who present themselves as democracy’s guardians, warn that allowing agency officials to answer to the elected president places the nation in peril. The argument recalls their reaction to the Dobbs case, when the court returned abortion policy to voters and was accused of “undermining democracy” by doing so.
RELATED: This Supreme Court case could reverse a century of bureaucratic overreach
Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call
On that point, Harsanyi and I agree. Judicial and bureaucratic overreach distort constitutional government. The harder question is whether voters object.
From what I can tell, most do not. Many Americans seem content to trade constitutional self-government for managerial rule, provided the system delivers benefits and protects their expressive preferences. The populist right may bristle at this arrangement, but a leftist administrative state that claims to speak for “the people” may reflect the electorate’s will.
Recent elections reinforce that suspicion. Voters showed little interest in reclaiming authority from courts or bureaucracies. They appeared far more interested in government largesse and symbolic rights than in the burdens of republican self-rule.
Consider abortion. Roe v. Wade rested on shaky legal ground, yet large segments of the public enthusiastically embraced it for nearly 50 years. When the Roberts Court overturned Roe in 2022 and returned the issue to the states, many voters responded with fury. States enacted expansive abortion laws, and Democrats benefited from unusually high turnout. The electorate did not welcome responsibility. It resented it.
This reaction should not surprise anyone familiar with history. In 1811, Spaniards rejected the liberal constitution imposed by French occupiers, crying “abajo el liberalismo” — down with liberalism. They did not want abstract rights. They wanted familiar authority.
At least half of today’s American electorate appears similarly disposed. Many prefer guided democracy administered by judges and managers to the uncertainties of self-government. Their votes signal approval for continued rule by the administrative state. Republicans may slow this process at the margins, but Democrats expand it openly, and voters just empowered them to do so.
RELATED: Stop letting courts and consultants shrink Trump’s signature promise
Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Bloomberg via Getty Images
I anticipated this outcome decades ago. In “After Liberalism” (1999), I argued that democracy as a universal ideal tends to produce expanded managerial control with popular consent. Nineteenth-century fears that mass suffrage would yield chaos proved unfounded. Instead the extension of the franchise coincided with more centralized, remote, and less accountable government.
As populations lost shared traditions and common authority, governance shifted away from democratic participation and toward expert administration. The state grew less personal, less local, and less answerable, even as it claimed to act in the people’s name.
Equally significant has been the administrative state’s success in presenting itself as the custodian of an invented “science of government.” According to this view, administrators form an enlightened elite, morally and intellectually superior to the unwashed masses. Justice Jackson’s warnings reflect this assumption.
I would like to believe, as Harsanyi suggests, that Americans find such attitudes insulting. I am no longer sure they do. Many seem pleased to be managed. They want judges and bureaucrats to make decisions for them.
That preference should trouble anyone who still cares about constitutional government.
Filipinas among top viewers on Pornhub in 2025; PH is 3rd top country overall for site traffic
_2025_12_16_15_53_06.jpg)
Filipinas were among the most active viewers of adult content on Pornhub in 2025, according to annual user data from its “Year in Review” insights.
Pokwang, kapatid ang driver na nambatok sa lalaking nagtutulak ng kariton
_2025_12_16_11_45_10.jpg)
Inihayag ni Pokwang na kapatid niya ang driver ng pickup truck na nag-viral matapos manakit at magsalita umano ng hindi maganda sa isang lalaking nagtutulak ng kariton habang kasama ang batang anak at umiiyak dulot ng nangyari. Bunsod nito, humingi ng paumanhin ang aktres sa mag-ama dahil sa ginagawa ng kaniyang kapatid.
Esnyr spends birthday giving food to street dogs and cats
_2025_12_16_14_21_47.jpg)
Esnyr marked his birthday with an act of kindness, choosing to feed street dogs and cats instead of holding a celebration at home.
126 Pinoys in Thailand-Cambodia border evacuated amid tension –envoy
There were 126 Filipinos residing near the border between Thailand and Cambodia who have evacuated amid the tension between the two Southeast Asian neighbors, the Philippine envoy to Thailand said on Tuesday.
Alex Eala ousts Thai bet, marches to SEA Games tennis finals
Just one victory stands between Alex Eala and her first-ever SEA Games gold medal after she stunned home bet Thasaporn Naklo, 6-1, 6-4 in the women’s singles semifinals on Tuesday in Thailand.
UAAP: UP vs. La Salle — Season 88 Finals series recap
The UAAP Season 88 men”s basketball finals is heading to Game 3 after De La Salle University and the University of the Philippines split the first two games of their best-of-three series.
