The judgment behind the abortion numbers
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
For decades, the pro-life movement has argued — rightly — that the unborn child is fully human. Not partially or potentially human. Not a life that becomes valuable later. A human being, made in the image of God, from the moment of conception.
And yet, that premise is not applied in law.
Equal justice is withheld. Justice is knowingly delayed. Entire classes of human beings are acknowledged in rhetoric and denied in practice — through heartbeat bills, 20-week bans, and fetal pain bills.
The same movement that insists on the humanity of the unborn defends strategies that refuse to treat that humanity as legally binding.
To know that a child is fully human and yet defend a legal framework that allows that child to be killed is not a lesser evil. It is a greater evil — because it is compounded.
Scripture goes further. When knowledge increases, so does accountability. When leaders teach truth, they are bound to it. And when they fail to act on what they teach, they do not merely err — they invite judgment.
We have been told to evaluate abortion policy on outcomes alone. But Scripture does not separate outcomes from obedience. It ties them together. God does not bless disobedience because it is politically strategic.
When disobedience is institutionalized — when it becomes the operating principle of a movement — the results should not surprise us.
RELATED: The collapse of conservatism nobody wants to admit
Blaze Media Illustration
Abortion does not decrease under compromise because compromise is not a neutral tool. It is a moral decision. It trains a culture to tolerate the very evil it claims to oppose. It teaches legislators to delay what they confess is urgent. It forms a people who say that the unborn are fully human, while structuring their laws as though they are not.
This is why the numbers do not tell the story we were promised. Not because the strategy was insufficiently refined, but because it was fundamentally misaligned. The issue is not that we have failed to compromise enough. It is that we have compromised at all.
God does not require political feasibility. He requires obedience.
Obedience does not ask how much injustice can be tolerated while we make progress. It asks what justice demands — and then establishes it.
Until that shift is made, the pattern will remain. More laws, more campaigns, more assurances of progress — and the same or worse results. Not because we lack the power to change it, but because we refuse to apply what we already know to be true. Until we do what is right, we should not expect the numbers to change — because God does not bless disobedience. He judges it.
That is why we must fight to establish equal justice under the law for our preborn neighbors — not by regulating abortion, but by abolishing it.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.